United States v. MacKey’s Empirical Analysis
647 F.2d 898 · 1981
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably United States v. Hurtado (1985), United States v. Ochoa-Sanchez (1982)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1826
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Nixon · Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Andresen v. Maryland · United States v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The diary and calendar were sought to establish that [the defendant] did indeed meet with competitors and engage in discussions that the Sherman Act prohibits. Because the government has not yet seen the documents, it would be unreasonable to expect a more detailed connection be provided between the contents of the documents and the ultimate facts at issue in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The compelled production of a physical object, such as a document, does not implicate the Fifth Amendment unless it is the act of production itself which is to be used as incriminating evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“used the diary and calendar to record business meetings and transactions that he conducted as an executive of (the corporation).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.