Jones v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
647 F.3d 350 · 2011
Citation profile
12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Melkonyan v. Sullivan · Sullivan v. Finkelstein · Bauzo v. Bowen · Butler v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The treating physician rule requires an explanation by the SSA, not the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kenner v. Berryhill“who rejects the opinion of a treating physician”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.