Constanza v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
647 F.3d 749 · 2011
Citation profile
26 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · ACOSTA · 19 I. & N. Dec. 439 - MOGARRABI · Barrios v. Holder · S-E-G
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). The BIA did not err. VII. Mayorga-Rosa argues that the BIA engaged in impermissible fact-finding to conclude that he does not have a well-founded fear of persecution. This court need not address this issue. Even if he has a well-founded fear of persecution, that fear must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Marambo]'s allegations ... amount to nothing more than challenges to factual determinations, which we lack jurisdiction to review under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marambo v. Barr“is removable as a 'criminal alien,' our jurisdiction is limited to constitutional claims and questions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Marambo v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.