Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross · Smith v. Maryland · California v. Acevedo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Those lawfully within the country, entitled to use the public highways, have a right to free passage without interruption or search unless there is known to a competent official authorized to search, probable cause for believing that their vehicles are carrying contraband or illegal merchandise.... Such a rule fulfills the guaranty of the Fourth Amendment. In cases where securing a warrant is reasonably practicable, it must be used, and when properly supported by affidavit and issued after judicial approval protects the seizing officer against a suit for damages. In cases where seizure is impossible except without a warrant, the seizing officer acts unlawfully and at his peril unless he can show the court probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ratliff v. State“[B]ecause it was practicable ... to obtain a search warrant, it was unreasonable ... to conduct a warrantless search of Green's automobile. To hold otherwise would obviate the need to obtain a warrant to search a car whenever probable cause exists, contrary to the holdings under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Black v. State“[olnly in exigent circumstances will the judgment of the police as to probable cause serve as a sufficient authorization for a search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ratliff v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.