Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 P2D 1113 - Boyles v. State

Boyles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2001

9 state decisions

40198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Houltin v. United States · California v. Civil Aeronautics Board · Sealfon v. United States · United States v. Oppenheimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The collateral estoppel analysis involves a three-step process: (1) an identification of the issues in the two actions for the purpose of determining whether the issues are sufficiently similar and sufficiently material in both actions to justify invoking the doctrine; (2) an examination of the record of the prior case to decide whether the issue was “litigated” in the first case; and (3) an examination of the record of the prior proceeding to ascertain whether the issue was necessarily decided in the first case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a final and valid judgment and the determination is essential to the judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A person commits the crime of perjury if the person makes a false sworn statement which the person does not believe to be true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.