¶1AFFIRMED. We affirm the summary denial of Bunch’s 3.800(a) motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice. Although Bunch has demonstrated a prima facie case of improper consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), the correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. See Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla.2d DCA 1994); Borders v. State, 643 So.2d 110 (Fla.2d DCA 1994); Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
647 So. 2d 1080
Bunch v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 13, 1995
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-01-13
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2009
3 state decisions
Relies on Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · Callaway v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-01-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →