Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 SO2D 139 - Apol v. Shaw

Apol v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 464 So. 2d 552 - Vetrick v. Hollander · 272 So. 2d 507 - University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. Stewart · 458 So. 2d 851 - CONE BROS. CONTR. v. Ashland-Warren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Lem T.'s third party complaint stated a cause of action for breach of contract arising from Pizza Hut's failure to maintain liability insurance covering the demised premises and naming Lem T. as an additional insured”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.