¶1The trial court improperly characterized the appellant’s motion for correction of an illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) as a motion for reduction of a legal sentence, required by rule 3.800(b) to be filed within sixty days after imposition of sentence. The denial of the *182motion as untimely was therefore error. However, because the record conclusively shows that appellant’s sentence was not illegal, the denial of the motion is AFFIRMED.
647 So. 2d 181
Dukes v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 29, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-06-29
Decided 1994-06-29