Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

647 So. 2d 181

Dukes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-06-29

Decided 1994-06-29

BARFIELD, Judge.

¶1The trial court improperly characterized the appellant’s motion for correction of an illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) as a motion for reduction of a legal sentence, required by rule 3.800(b) to be filed within sixty days after imposition of sentence. The denial of the *182motion as untimely was therefore error. However, because the record conclusively shows that appellant’s sentence was not illegal, the denial of the motion is AFFIRMED.

MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
/647/so2d/181 · .json · Public domain