Daniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kehoe v. State · Owen v. State · Jackson v. State · 605 So. 2d 561 - Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DOES THE RULING IN KEHOE V. STATE, 521 So.2d 1094 (FLA. 1988), REQUIRE SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE OBTAINED AS A RESULT OF THE STOP OF A MOTOR VEHICLE FOR A MINOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION WHERE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE STOP WAS PRETEXTUAL, BUT THE STATE FAILS TO AFFIRMATIVELY ESTABLISH BY EVIDENCE THAT A REASONABLE POLICE OFFICER WOULD HAVE ROUTINELY STOPPED A MOTOR VEHICLE FOR THE SAME VIOLATION?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Daniel · Roddy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.