Dautel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 537 So. 2d 103 - Forehand v. State · 516 So. 2d 50 - Samples v. State · 535 So. 2d 316 - Collier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Due Process Clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged. ") (emphasis added). Even the district court in the instant case recognized that only the elements of the out-of-state crime have "been established as the result of an entry of a plea or ... [have] been proven beyond a reasonable doubt as evidenced by a guilty verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dautel v. State“MAY THE TRIAL COURT CONSIDER THE UNDERLYING FACTS IN DETERMINING WHETHER AN OUT-OF-STATE CONVICTION IS ANALOGOUS TO A FLORIDA STATUTE FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING POINTS FOR A SENTENCING GUIDELINES SCORESHEET.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dautel v. State“there are few cases in Florida that directly address the issue of what matters the trial court may consider in determining whether an out-of-state conviction is analogous to Florida statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dautel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.