Watson v. State

Robert Lee WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 1994.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-11-16

Relies on Williams v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2014

8 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1David C. Dwiggins, Lakeland, for appellant.

¶2Robert Lee Watson, pro se.

¶3Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Christopher M. Sierra, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5In this Anders appeal, we find merit only in appellant's argument that the imposition of $2.00 in costs was improper because appellant was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard. We agree and order those $2.00 costs stricken. See Williams v. State,601 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We otherwise affirm.

¶6FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and BLUE, JJ., concur.