Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 So. 2d 254 - Pullum v. Johnson

647 So. 2d 254 - Pullum v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2018

5 state decisions

20199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Cohen v. California · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Rosenblatt v. Baer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not to be dissected and judged word for word or phrase by phrase, the entire publication must be examined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The First Amendment requires neither politeness or fairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.