Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

647 So. 2d 261

Beatty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-11-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2005

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“facially deficient in that it [did] not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c)”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 907 So. 2d 614 - Burchfield v. State

Relies on 641 So. 2d 172 - Schofield v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 8.850 motion for post-conviction relief is facially deficient, in that it does not contain all of the information required by rule 3.850(c). See, e.g., Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The order denying relief is therefore affirmed.

ALLEN, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.
/647/so2d/261 · .json · Public domain