Zeigler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 378 So. 2d 7 - Rodriguez v. State · 618 So. 2d 734 - Biller v. State · 358 So. 2d 183 - Hines v. State · Nank v. State · 645 So. 2d 1 - Tomlinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n determining whether a [special] condition of probation is reasonably related to rehabilitation, we believe that a condition is invalid if it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to future criminality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Fernandez v. State · Spano v. State“[C]ondition eight, prohibiting defendant from visiting places where controlled substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed or used, is a valid condition of probation. Such a condition is a more explicit clarification of conduct prohibited under subsection 948.03(1)(i), Florida Statutes (1991), which states as an approved condition of probation that an offender may "not associate with persons engaged in criminal activities." This is a general condition that is valid and need not have been pronounced in open court. Accordingly, we approve of this condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jaworski v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.