¶1We have for review the decision in M.S.P. v. State, 640 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), which certified conflict with the opinion in B.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.Const. The decision below is quashed and the case remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in B.H. v. State, 645 So.2d 987 (Fla.1994).
¶2It is so ordered.
¶3concurring in part and dissenting in part.
¶4I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons stated in my separate opinion to B.H. v. State, 645 So.2d 987 (Fla.1994) (Harding, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part).