Coble v. Aronson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2017
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 506 So. 2d 1039 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 6C(1) · 565 So. 2d 1323 - Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Lane · 496 So. 2d 239 - Barrios v. Duran · 632 So. 2d 76 - Segall v. Segall · 590 So. 2d 1051 - Pennsylvania Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Sikes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“could potentially be the cause of redressable harm or financial loss to [the client], especially in the nature of costs and attorney's fees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. H. Boone Porter, Iii, in His Capacity as Individual Co-Trustee of the H. Boone Porter Trust Created Under Deed of Trust Dated 8/1/60 as Amended by Amendment Dated 5/14/68, and Individually, and in His Capacity as of the Estate of Rev. H. Boone Porter, Commerce Bank, N.A., a National Banking Association, in Its Capacity as Corporate Co-Trustees of the H. Boone Porter Trust Created Under · Porter III 8/1/60 5/14/68 v. H Na H
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.