Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 SW2D 617 - Campbell v. Dixon

Campbell v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2014

8 state decisions

601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commerce Trust Co. v. Watts · State Ex Rel. Place v. Bland · Jones v. Linder · Herbert & Brooner Construction Co. v. Golden · Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of fraud, duress, mistake or mental incapacity, an integrated unambiguous written contract may not be varied, altered or contradicted by parol or extrinsic evidence, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements are conclusively presumed to have been merged into the written contract, which itself becomes and is the single and final memorial of the understanding and intention of the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.