Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 SW2D 657 - Hunter v. State

Hunter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 1998
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simpkins v. State · Jackson v. State · Watson v. State · Bravo v. State · Senn v. Manchester Bank of St. Louis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person acts with criminal negligence, or is criminally negligent, with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor’s standpoint.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen the evidence from any source raises an issue of a lesser included offense, and there is testimony that, if guilty at all, the defendant is only guilty of the lesser included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.