Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 SW2D 692 - Parker v. Holbrook

Parker v. Holbrook’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably International Administrators, Inc. v. Life Insurance Co. of North America (1985), 125 Ill. App. 3d 415 - Thomas v. Petrulis (1984)

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

1201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 300K

Relies on City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority · United States v. Louisiana · Moore v. United States · Swilley v. Hughes · Reagan v. Guardian Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the power to exercise judgment and discretion; (2) the power to hear and determine or to ascertain facts and decide; (3) the power to make binding orders and judgments; (4) the power to affect the personal or property rights of private persons; (5) the power to examine witnesses, to compel the attendance of witnesses, and to hear the litigation of issues on a hearing; and (6) the power to enforce decisions or impose penalties.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the class of absolute privileges has traditionally been very limited,” we noted that although,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.