Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 F.2d 1188 - Walker v. Solem

Walker v. Solem’s Empirical Analysis

648 F.2d 1188 · 1981

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Sumner v. Mata · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division · Abujasen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are not unmindful of the observation of the Supreme Court of South Dakota 'that defense counsel had many years experience as a practicing attorney and was particularly successful as a criminal defense lawyer. State v. Walker, 287 N.W.2d 705, 706 (S.D.1980). Cf. United States v. DeCoster, 487 F.2d 1197 , 1202 n. 21 (D.C.Cir.1973) ('It is important to stress that the issue in ineffectiveness cases is not a lawyer's culpability, but rather his client's constitutional rights, [citations omitted] Even the best attorney may render ineffective assistance, often for reasons totally extraneous to his or her ability.').”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must show both incompetence and material prejudice resulting from the incompetence in order to prevail on his claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.