Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 F.2d 321 - Legel Braswell Government Securities Corp Westchester County Savings and Loan Association v. Legel Braswell Government Securities Corp Irving Trust Company

Legel Braswell Government Securities Corp Westchester County Savings and Loan Association v. Legel Braswell Government Securities Corp Irving Trust Company’s Empirical Analysis

648 F.2d 321 · 1981

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably Gray v. Lucas (1982), Barrientes v. Johnson (2000)

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

210198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner v. Gordon · Armstrong v. Collier · Hall v. Bank of Blasdell · Oscar Gruss Son v. First State Bank of Eldorado W

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here a district court fails to make necessary findings, a remand for entry of such findings is the usual recourse for an appellate court; however, where all of the issues on appeal may be fairly resolved from the record presented, a remand may not be required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A repurchase agreement or repo 'is essentially a short-term collateralized loan' although it is in the form of a sale.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although generally speaking the bankruptcy court should be allowed to make all the necessary findings of facts to support its conclusions, appellate courts need not remand and may make additional findings themselves when the evidence before it is documentary or if all the facts relied upon to support the particular judgment are in the record before the appellate court and are undisputed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.