Newman v. A. E. STALEY MANUFACTURING CO.’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.2d 330 · 1981
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc. (2000), Jackson v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad (1982)
63 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Quercia v. United States · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas · Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-Appellees
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'necessarily obtained for use in the case.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he influence of the trial judge on the jury 'is necessarily and properly of great weight' and his 'lightest word or intimation is received with deference, and may prove controlling'.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where a trial judge's comments were so prejudicial as to deny a party an opportunity for a fair and impartial trial, the absence of objections will not preclude our review since counsel will be loathe to challenge the propriety of a trial judge's utterances for fear of antagonizing him and thereby prejudicing a client's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.