United States v. Engleman’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.2d 473 · 1981
Citation profile
79 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Spillone (1989), United States v. Alvarez (1985)
79 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Katz v. United States · Patterson v. United States · Bullock v. United States · United States v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[T]here is no absolute rule regarding the number of years that can separate offenses. Rather, the court applies a reasonableness standard and examines the facts and circumstances of each case.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Handy was in no way involved in this [prior] scheme.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.