Kornock v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.2d 525 · 1980
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 16105b v. Dar Reddick, Embrey v. Bowen (1988)
31 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Hall v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Johnson v. Harris · Cox v. Califano · Walker v. Mathews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The ability to work only a few hours at day or to work only on an intermittent basis is not the ability to engage in 'substantial gainful activity.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion,'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the reviewing court must 'look at the record as a whole and not merely at the evidence lending support to a finding,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.