Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 F.2d 565 - United States v. Taylor

United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

648 F.2d 565 · 1981

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably United States v. Khoury (1990), United States v. Walgren (1989)

34 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions

31019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Agurs · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · United States v. Calandra · United States v. Russell · Sherman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “outweigh the considerations of administrative convenience and judicial economy,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “motions and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. This inquiry necessitates a twofold analysis: (1) whether the petitioner’s allegations specifically delineate the factual basis of his claim; and, (2) even where the allegations are specific, whether the records, files and affidavits are conclusive against the petitioner.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “implicates the fundamental fairness of the trial and propriety of the Government's actions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.