United States v. Anthon’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.2d 669 · 1981
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2011 · most notably United States v. Whitten (1983), Florida v. Powell (2010)
24 federal appellate · 4 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Schmerber v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the trial court record may very well have established that Anthon requested that he be allowed to re-enter the hotel room to change his clothes and gather his personal effects if the trial attorneys had properly pursued interrogation in this regard, the fact is that there is nothing in the record before us to indicate whether such a request was made. On the contrary, the record simply indicates that immediately following Anthon’s arrest the officers returned him to his room. Accordingly, the warrant-less entry into Anthon’s hotel room was violative of his rights secured by the Fourth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“There is no suggestion that anyone consented to the search. The officers were not responding to an emergency. They were not in hot pursuit of a fleeing felon. The goods ultimately seized were not in the process of destruction. Nor were they about to be removed from the jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“was not advised of the right to have counsel present during questioning and the right to stop the questioning at any time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.