United States v. Previte’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.2d 73 · 1981
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Commonwealth v. Tavares (1982), United States v. Griffin (1987)
47 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Glasser v. United States · Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Agurs · Ashe v. Swenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * failure to preserve any objection to the jury verdict below results in a waiver of appellant’s right to claim an impermissibly ambiguous verdict * * United States v. Previte, 648 F.2d 73, 80 (1st Cir.1981). See Williams v. United States, 238 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 1024 , 77 S.Ct. 589 , 1 L.Ed.2d 596 (1957).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clegg v. State“when the substantive offense is of a sort that necessarily requires the active, or culpable, participation of the same . . . people for its successful completion,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“could hardly be said to have emphasized such testimony during trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.