Keyser v. Commissioner Social Security Administration’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.3d 721 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 18 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Tackett v. Apfel · United States v. Patterson · Moore v. Barnhart · Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration · Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Is the claimant presently working in a substantially gainful activity? (2) Is the claimant’s impairment severe? (3) Does the impairment meet or equal one of a list of specific impairments described in the regulations? (4) Is the claimant able to perform any work that he or she has done in the past? and (5) Are there significant numbers of jobs in the national economy that the claimant can perform?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Social Security Regulations set out a five-step sequential process for determining whether an applicant is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.