Dreith v. NU Image, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.3d 779 · 2011
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · United States v. Fine · Malone v. United States Postal Service · Adriana International Corp. v. Thoeren · Yourish v. California Amplifier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider the merits of this action, as both public policy and the policy of this court dictate”); In re Sharma, No. CC-12-1302, 2013 WL 1987351 , at -6 (9th Cir. BAP May 14, 2013) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.