Perez-Ramirez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
648 F.3d 953 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Wakkary v. Holder · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Melkonian v. Ashcroft · Guo v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all evidence relevant to the possibility of future torture ... including, but not limited to: (i) Evidence of past torture inflicted upon the applicant; (ii) Evidence that the applicant could relocate to a part of the country of removal where he or she is not likely to be tortured; (iii) Evidence of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights within the country of removal, where applicable; and (iv) Other relevant information regarding conditions in the country of removal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Maldonado v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.