Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 FSUPP 40 - Rosenberg v. Digilog Inc.

Rosenberg v. Digilog Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 1992
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Blackie v. Barrack · List v. Fashion Park, Inc. · Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand · Panzirer v. Wolf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Imposing such a requirement [of a scheme] creates another burden which could effectively preclude the maintenance of otherwise legitimate suits under the Security laws. Securities legislation, enacted for the purpose of avoiding fraud, is intended by Congress to be construed ... flexibly to effectuate its remedial purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Blackie did not require proof of a common scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.