Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. State · Coolman v. State · Romary v. State · Averhart v. State · Clark v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall base its restitution order upon consideration of: (1) property damages of the victim incurred as a result of the crime, based on the actual cost of repair (or replacement if repair is inappropriate)[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Collins v. State“`exclude the prosecuting witness would ... place the state at great disadvantage, by leaving its representative without aid from any one having personal knowledge of the case'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hernandez v. State“`it is proper to except [from separation] the prosecuting witness ... to be present during the examination of other witness'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hernandez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.