Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 18 Va. App. 840 - Woolfolk v. Commonwealth · Price v. State · 25 Cal. App. 4th 391 - People v. Heilman · Helton v. State · Kennedy v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he actions must not only cause the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened but must be such that would cause a reasonable person to feel so, as well. The reasonableness standards contained in the statutes provide a constraining and intelligible enforcement standard for those charged with enforcing the statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another person that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“militates against a determination that the statute[ ][is] vague.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.