Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

648 P.2d 1207

Bellmon v. Albert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1982

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1982-06-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-06-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2009

11 state decisions

50198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BARNES, Vice Chief Justice,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I concur in the dissent of Justice Simms, but I dissent for the further reason that I do not believe that the Referee’s Report is comprehensive enough to allow me to properly evaluate it. I would ask the Referee for a supplemental report setting out his reasons for admitting some signatures in a particular category while excluding others. As pointed out in the Protestants’ Motion for Order Requiring Supplemental Referee’s Report, it does not indicate which 10,-579 of the 16,227 names challenged were invalid, nor why certain names were valid and others were not. Before I can make a final decision on the sufficiency of the signatures I need to know the criteria used by the referee to disqualify names on the petition for non-registration.

/648/p2d/1207 · .json · Public domain