Spitznas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2017
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Dobbert v. Florida · Beazell v. State of Ohio Chatfield · United States v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Beazell, supra, at 269 U.S. at 171 , 46 S.Ct. at 69 , 70 L.Ed. at 218 . It has been the rule in Oklahoma that a law is within the protection of the provision”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The statute challenged herein does not attempt to control a matter in which the courts have ultimate authority. There is no fundamental right to bail on appeal, and the effect of its denial is to require immediate commencement of a sentence rendered by the trial court and is “simply another aspect of the punishment provisions of the statutory scheme.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stiegele v. State“what alterations of procedure will be held to be of sufficient moment to transgress the constitutional prohibition ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.