People v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2000
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Karrell v. United States · Tompkins v. DeLeon · 94 Wash. 2d 489 - State v. Eilts · Karrell v. United States · Montgomery v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a condition of every sentence to probation, the court shall provide that the defendant make restitution to the victim of his conduct for the actual damages which were sustained.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Milne · People v. Cera““One line of cases extends payment of restitution beyond the immediate victim of the crime. Shenah v. Henderson, 106 Ariz. 399 , 476 P.2d 854 (1970); People v. Bond, 99 Mich. App. 86 , 297 N.W.2d 620 (1980); State v. Green, 29 N.C. App. 574 , 225 S.E.2d 170 , cert. denied, 290 N.C. 665 , 228 S.E.2d 455 (1976); Flores v. State, 513 S.W.2d 66 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). The other line of cases strictly limits the payment of restitution to the immediate victim or ‘party whose rights, personal or property, were invaded by the defendant as a result of which criminal proceedings were successfully concluded.’ People v. Grago, 24 Misc. 2d 739 , 204 N.Y.S.2d 774 (Cty. Ct. 1960). Accord: United States v. Clovis Retail Liquor Dealers, 540 F.2d 1389 (10th Cir. 1976); Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); Montgomery v. State, 292 Md. 155 , 438 A.2d 490 (1981); State v. Eilts, 23 Wash. App. 39 , 596 P.2d 1050 (1979), aff’d, 94 Wash. 2d 489 , 617 P.2d 993 (1980).” 648 P.2d at 174-75 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yost“as it appears in § 16-11-204.5, C.R.S. 1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.), to refer to the party immediately and directly aggrieved by the criminal act, and not to others who suffer loss because of some relationship, contractual or otherwise, to the directly aggrieved party. 648 P.2d at 174 . As a consequence, the court held, a victim’s insurer is not itself a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.