Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 S.E.2d 708 - In Re CT

In Re CT’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 240 Ga. App. 677 - In Re Km · In the Interest of A. T. H. · In the Interest of T. P. · 155 Ga. App. 38 - Shover v. Department of Human Resources · In the Interest of L. J. L.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “although the mother may struggle financially and indeed may need assistance in the care of her children, the mere fact that she earns little money and lives in a modest home does not constitute clear and convincing evidence that the mother is unfit and that the children's deprivation is likely to continue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f we have omitted any fact or failed to locate relevant evidence, the responsibility lies with counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “poverty alone is not a basis for termination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.