648 So. 2d 100 - Hardwick v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State (2000), 774 So. 2d 637 - Rutherford v. Moore (2000)
3 federal appellate · 49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Payne v. Tennessee · Scharffe v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the alleged omissions are of such magnitude as to constitute a serious error or substantial deficiency falling measurably outside the range of professionally acceptable performance”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] defendant has no constitutional right to be present at the bench during conferences that involve purely legal matters.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coney v. State · Morris v. State“As the United States Supreme Court explained in Sochor v. Florida, federal law does not require a state appellate court to remand for resentencing when it determines that an invalid aggravating factor has been weighed by the sentences but the appellate court must “either itself reweigh without the invalid aggravating factor or determine that weighing the invalid factor was harmless error.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Geralds v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.