Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 So. 2d 1052 - Witter v. Witter

648 So. 2d 1052 - Witter v. Witter’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2011

4 state decisions

20199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 633 So. 2d 918 - Penton v. Clarkson · 600 So. 2d 823 - Murphy v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc. · 602 So. 2d 1108 - Matter of Succession of Thomas · 615 So. 2d 1060 - First American Bank & Trust v. First Guar. Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Article 863 does not empower a district court to impose sanctions on lawyers simply because a particular argument or ground for relief is subsequently found to be unjustified; failure to prevail does not trigger an award of sanctions. The article is intended to be used only in exceptional circumstances; where there is even the slightest justification for the assertion of a legal right, sanctions are not warranted. (Citations omitted; emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.