Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 SO2D 1187 - Tucker v. Resha

Tucker v. Resha’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably 685 So. 2d 773 - Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc. (1996), 696 So. 2d 1103 - Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc. (1996)

53 state decisions

2601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Butz v. Economou

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “subject to interlocutory review to the extent that the order turns on an issue of law.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`is effectively lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.