State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
134 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably 684 So. 2d 368 - State v. Seals (1996), 750 So. 2d 832 - State v. Snyder (1999)
134 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“firmly convinced that the jury was influenced by the remarks and that they contributed to the verdict.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“prejudicial conduct inside or outside the courtroom makes it impossible for the defendant to receive a fair trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[m]istrial is a drastic remedy generally and the determination `of whether prejudice has resulted lies in the sound discretion of the trial judge.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.