Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 So. 2d 228 - Davis v. State

648 So. 2d 228 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · 626 So. 2d 655 - State v. Young · 584 So. 2d 1105 - Matthews v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]irst determine whether adequate grounds exist for replacement of the defendant's attorney. If the court finds that the defendant ... has no legitimate complaint, it is then required to advise the defendant that if his request to discharge his attorney is granted, the court is not required to appoint substitute counsel and the defendant would be exercising his right to represent himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.