Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 So. 2d 406 - Ayers v. Brazzell

648 So. 2d 406 - Ayers v. Brazzell’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2010

7 state decisions

30199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berkovitz v. United States · Fowler v. Roberts · Lemire v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. · 618 So. 2d 834 - Taylor v. Giddens · 630 So. 2d 1271 - Rick v. STATE, DOTD

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... any act, action, or failure to take action by a public servant ... in connection with the implementation of any provision of a building code, including but not limited to the examination or review of any plan, drawing, or specifications, the conducting or completion of any inspection, the issuance, denial, or revocation of any permit, permission, license, or certificate, and the granting of any approval of construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “After our examination of the record, we find that the plaintiffs properly raised this [constitutional] issue in the trial court, but a ruling on the issue was pretermitted. Without a trial court ruling, it would be improper for this court, in the first instance, to consider the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he performance of any enforcement procedure in connection with any building code shall be deemed to be a discretionary act and shall be subject to the provisions of R.S. 9:2798.1.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.