648 So. 2d 472 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Michigan v. Tucker · United States v. Hale · Kentucky v. Indiana · 304 So. 2d 300 - State v. Kaufman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered when a remark or comment, made within the hearing of the jury by the judge, district attorney, or a court official, during the trial or in argument, refers directly or indirectly to: [[Image here]] (2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible; [[Image here]] An admonition to the jury to disregard the remark or comment shall not be sufficient to prevent a mistrial. If the defendant, however, requests that only an admonition be given, the court shall admonish the jury to disregard the remark or comment but shall not declare a mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“-433 Other extrinsic evidence, including prior inconsistent statements and evidence contradicting the witness’ ^testimony, is admissible when offered solely to attack the credibility of a witness unless the court determines that the probative value of the evidence on the issue of credibility is substantially outweighed by the risks of undue consumption of time, confusion of the issues, or unfair prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as the interests of justice otherwise require, extrinsic evidence of bias, interest, or corruption, prior inconsistent statements, conviction of crime, or defects of capacity is admissible after the proponent has first fairly directed the witness' attention to the statement, act, or matter alleged, and the witness has been given the opportunity to admit the fact and has failed distinctly to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.