Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 So. 2d 903 - Shaw v. Hingle

648 So. 2d 903 - Shaw v. Hingle’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2014

8 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Lyman Lamb Co. · 377 So. 2d 346 - General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Daniels · 405 So. 2d 314 - Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. Matherne · Shaw v. Bourn · Shaw v. Bourn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Ajpplying such an interpretation to this case would ignore a fundamental distinction, namely, that [the creditor] is not attempting to enjoin the sale of property in order to enforce rights which arise from the executory proceedings; rather he is attempting by means of the injunction to preserve the status quo pending a resolution of his revocatory action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant in the executory proceeding may arrest the seizure and sale of the property by injunction when the debt secured by the security interest, mortgage, or privilege is extinguished, or is legally unenforceable, or if the procedure required by law for an executory proceeding has not been followed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “irreparable injury, loss, or damage may otherwise result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.