Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 So. 2d 95 - Fennie v. State

648 So. 2d 95 - Fennie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 660 So. 2d 637 - Johnson v. State (1995), 753 So. 2d 9 - Zack v. State (2000)

1 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants · Bauer v. Waldschmidt · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he totality of the aggravating factors and lack of significant mitigating circumstances conclusively demonstrate that death is the appropriate penalty in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The lengthy and drawn out nature of this crime clearly indicates [the defendant] carefully contemplated his actions prior to the fatal incident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`An abuse of discretion is generally not found unless the court's ruling on the continuance results in undue prejudice to defendant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.