Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 648 S.W.2d 286 - Huff v. Huff

Huff v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
6
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Clark v. Amoco Production Co. (1986), Creech v. Addington (2009)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

1601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sistare v. Sistare · Matilda Von Ellert Sistare v. Horace Randall Sistare · Freeman v. McAninch · Curtis v. Gibbs · Ogletree v. Crates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On motion of any party entitled to receive payments for the benefit of a child, the court may render judgment against a defaulting party for any amount unpaid and owing after 10 days notice to the defaulting party of his failure or refusal to carry out the terms of the order. The judgment may be enforced by any means available for the enforcement of debts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[a]s motions to revive and enforce portions of a final judgment awarding child support, § 14.09(c) actions come within the direct purview of the statute of limitations governing the revival and enforcement of judgments, Art. 5532, the ten-year statute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. In Re SCS
  3. “we would be opening the door to the wholesale frustration of the ten-year statute of limitations for all final judgments in this important area of family law. Such a usurpation of the legislative function is beyond the jurisdiction of this [c]ourt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. In Re TLK

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.