State v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 1994
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Van · Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. Bettendorf · State v. Smith · State v. Bivens · 95 Mo. App. 609 - Stephan v. Metzger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That the record, in this instance, was prepared to determine how much cash had been stolen does not remove it from the business record exception to the hearsay rule. The fact that a record was made in anticipation of litigation does not render that record inadmissible. The relevant inquiry is whether the record was made in the ordinary course of business. Bohn v. James, 573 S.W.2d 448, 450 (Mo.App.1978). We believe this one was.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williamson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.