Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 649 F.2d 237 - Henrico Professional Firefighters Association Local v. Board of Supervisors of Henrico County

Henrico Professional Firefighters Association Local v. Board of Supervisors of Henrico County’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
November 1994
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Buckley v. Valeo · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Sherbert v. Verner · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When governmental action deprives a person or organization of the right to communicate its views, but at the same time allows other persons or organizations to speak, the Supreme Court sometimes analyzes the case under the First Amendment, as in Bellotti, supra, and sometimes under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. See, e.g., Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 , 92 S.Ct. 2286 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972). Governmental action permitting some to speak, but denying the opportunity to others, raises an "equal protection claim ... [that] is closely intertwined with First Amendment interests.” Mosley, supra, 408 U.S. at 95, 92 S.Ct. at 2289 . Henrico Professional Firefighters Association, Local 1568 v. Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, 649 F.2d 237, 241 (4th Cir.1981), citing First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 , 98 S.Ct. 1407 , 55 L.Ed.2d 707 (1978). See also Burson v. Freeman, — U.S.-,n. 3, 112 S.Ct. 1846 , 1850 n. 3, 119 L.Ed.2d 5 (U.S.S.C.1992). In the case at bar, Pesek couches his claim in terms of first amendment analysis, rather than alleging an equal protection claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'Representation' in the labor context means, of course, something more extensive, more exclusive and more enduring than the simple 'representation' involved in standing up to speak on another's behalf.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “public employer may have interests in regulating the speech of its employees that differ from its interests in regulation of speech of the citizenry at large,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.