Stein's Inc. v. Blumenthal’s Empirical Analysis
649 F.2d 463 · 1980
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020 · most notably Bryan v. United States (1998), American Arms International v. Herbert (2009)
16 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Raddatz · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United Mine Workers of America v. Benedict Coal Corporation · G. H. Miller & Company v. United States of America and Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States · Modica v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]onsiderations of judicial economy suggest that the trial anew of factual matters already litigated should be avoided unless . substantial doubt infects the agency's findings of fact.” Id. Furthermore, where an eviden-tiary hearing is necessary,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[B]ecause the procedure for review pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 923 (f)(3) permits the district court to enter judgment on the basis of the administrative record when no substantial reason to receive additional evidence is present, the practice of the courts has been to grant judgment summarily when the material facts developed at the administrative hearing, which the court also concludes justify [the ATF’s revocation of a license], are not substantially drawn into question by the party petitioning for review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“knew of his legal obligation and purposefully disregarded or was plainly indifferent to the recordkeeping requirements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.